Skip to content
Drone news desk
DevelopingPolicyRule watch2 min read

The FCC put the Pentagon's DJI and Autel letters to Congress into the record, and says it did not rely on them

An October 14 FCC notice files the Department of War's section 1709 letters in the DJI and Autel dockets: redacted cover pages in public, classified letters under seal. The FCC says it did not rely on them for any related Covered List additions.

By

More onDJIFCC & the Covered List

Illustration: a drone on a work surface, standing in for federal security lists (not a DJI or Autel aircraft)
Illustration: a drone on a work surface, standing in for federal security lists (not a DJI or Autel aircraft).

Decision brief

Nothing changes for drones you already own, and nothing moves on or off the Covered List. The notice adds documents to the record of DJI's petition for reconsideration and Autel's application for review, and the FCC has not ruled on either. The public sees only redacted cover pages, so whatever the Pentagon told Congress stays sealed.

Released
Oct. 14, 2026

Public Notice DA 26-1106, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau

Dockets
ET 26-22 and 26-23

SZ DJI Technology and Autel Robotics

Public part
Cover pages only

Redacted, unclassified cover pages; the classified letters are under seal

The notice

Pentagon letters to Congress, now in the FCC record.

The FCC's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau released Public Notice DA 26-1106 on October 14. It places into two FCC dockets the letters the Department of War sent to congressional committees under section 1709 of the Fiscal Year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act. The dockets are ET Docket 26-22, for SZ DJI Technology, and ET Docket 26-23, for Autel Robotics. The redacted, unclassified cover pages go in the public record. The classified letters go in under seal. The notice says the letters came from Michael P. Cadenazzi of the department's Industrial Base Policy office.

The FCC's caveat

The agency says it did not rely on them.

The notice adds one line of its own: the FCC did not rely on these materials when it made any related additions to the Covered List. It also explains why the letters are surfacing now. The department cited them in its April 6 filing in these dockets, saying they fulfilled its duty under section 1709 to report to certain congressional committees.

The law

What section 1709 required.

Section 1709 gave an appropriate national security agency one year to decide whether communications or video surveillance equipment from DJI and Autel poses an unacceptable risk. If no agency decided in time, the FCC had to add that equipment to the Covered List. When an agency does find an unacceptable risk, the law says it must report to the appropriate congressional committees in unclassified form, with an optional classified annex.

Still pending

DJI's and Autel's challenges have no ruling yet.

The two dockets hold the companies' challenges. The FCC's filing system shows DJI's petition for reconsideration in the record since January 22 and Autel's application for review since January 21. It lists the department's April 6 filing in both dockets as an opposition. The record shows no ruling on either.

Continue on Drone Authority

Continue this beat

More policy reporting

Follow policy

Editorial standard. Claims are tied to the sources on this page. Material corrections are logged publicly and can be sent to corrections@droneauthority.org.

How the news desk works